Squiggly shapes art

Adding biomarker evidence to your existing algorithm may help increase your confidence in diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1-6

Squiggly shapes art

Adding biomarker evidence to your existing algorithm may help increase your confidence in diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1-6

Blood biomarkers tests, like p-tau217, could potentially offer a fast, less invasive, and cost-effective method to aid in the early detection and diagnosis of Alzheimer’s pathology in symptomatic patients.7

syringe icon

Blood biomarkers are currently used to identify the probability of the presence or absence of amyloid plaques in the brain8

Blood vial icon

Phosphorylated tau, or P-tau, is a key blood biomarker for AD, and P-tau217 is considered the most reliable blood biomarker in helping to detect evidence of AD pathology, including amyloid9,10

PET scan icon

In conjunction with clinical assessment, P-tau217 has a strong correlation with amyloid PET scans, making it a valuable blood biomarker for detecting AD pathology, including amyloid, in its initial stages9,10

Patients must meet testing criteria. These tests are not intended to be used as a standalone diagnostic to determine a diagnosis; they must be utilized with other clinical assessment results.

In conjunction with clinical assessments, blood biomarkers tests can be used to detect or rule out evidence of AD pathology, including amyloid, primarily for patients aged ≥65 years, given their higher rate of amyloid positivity. Younger patients who meet the test’s intended use may also be considered.10,11

PET scans and CSF tests are also available to help assess amyloid pathology in patients with suspected AD, and there are additional AD biomarkers beyond P-tau217 that could be considered in a diagnostic workup.10

Many blood tests* that include P-tau217 can be highly accurate for confirming or ruling out AD pathology, including amyloid, in patients with cognitive decline or MCI12

A head-to-head study of leading blood-based biomarker assays for AD identified plasma P-tau217 as the most accurate for detecting AD pathology. The study also showed %P-tau217 had a slightly stronger correlation with amyloid PET than P-tau assays alone.13§

P-tau217 Ratio (%P-tau217) Demonstrates Clinical Utility in Diagnosing AD14||

Can Blood Biomarkers Confirm AD Pathology?

Network icon

CEOi Thought Leader Consensus10*

  • Blood biomarkers (BBMs) can serve as confirmatory tests for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology
  • Recommended tests should meet ≥90% sensitivity, ≥90% specificity, and ≤20% intermediate results
Rx icon

CMS recognizes Alzheimer's disease (AD) blood biomarkers (BBM) as an option to confirm the presence of amyloid pathology when using the CMS registry as a coverage pathway for amyloid-targeting therapies.

Commercially available P-tau217 assays in the United States15-20¶

Company

ARUP© Laboratories

Name

Phospho-Tau 217

Company

C2N Diagnostics

Test Name

PrecivityAD2

Company

Fujirebio

Test Name

Lumipulse P-tau217/Beta Amyloid 42 Ratio

Company

Lucent Diagnostics

Test Name

LucentAD© Complete

Company

Mayo Clinic

Test Name

Phospho-Tau217

Company

Neurocode

Test Name

ALZpath Dx: Plasma
Phosphorylated Tau 217 [P-tau217]

Company

Quest Diagnostics

Test Name

AD-Detect ABeta 42/40 and p-tau217 Evaluation

This list only includes some commercially available tests. It is only intended for informational purposes and your consideration, and is based on publicly available information as of June 30, 2025. Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) makes no representations regarding the clinical or analytical validity, manufacturing quality, or design of the testing offered by the vendors included on this list. Inclusion on this list does not represent an endorsement, referral, or recommendation by Lilly nor representation of assay performance compared to CEOi** acceptable performance criteria for a confirmatory or triage assay. Contact the laboratory vendor for more information. All trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Blood tests are accessible, low-cost, and scalable11

Learn how to easily implement blood tests into your practice to act early on AD11

~

~90% accurancy

BBM Perception: Blood tests might not be as accurate as PET scans or CSF tests that can detect amyloid pathology in cognitively impaired individuals.

The thing to know: Many blood tests that include P-tau217 demonstrate accuracy of approximately 90%, similar to FDA-cleared CSF IVD tests, and are concordant with amyloid PET status and align to the highest standard of CEOi guidance.9-10, 13-14

cost effective

BBM Perception: Adding BBM tests will drive up testing costs and may feel out of reach for some patients.

The thing to know: Based on CEOi guidance, using plasma P-tau217 in conjunction with clinical assessments can result in cost savings of up to 60% compared to CSF tests and 81% compared to PET scans, making them cost effective.10, 28-29**

Assess for Amyloid Pathology

BBM Perception: P-tau217 tests are used only to assess tau pathology and not helpful in identifying the presence of amyloid.

The thing to know: BBM tests that measure phosphorylated tau217 (P-tau217) levels are highly concordant with amyloid levels as measured by PET in symptomatic patients.9-10

Hear from a neurology expert on the importance of a complete workup prior to referral

BBM Additional Information

Blood Biomarker Brochure

CEOi Blood Database

Non-inferiority Study

Clinical Utility Study

Additional diagnostic tools

CSF testing1,2

  • Determine amyloid beta (eg, CSF Aβ42/Aβ40) and tau protein (eg, total tau and phosphorylated tau) levels measured in cerebrospinal fluid. Learn more about CSF tests
  • A multidisciplinary workgroup convened by the Alzheimer’s Association developed appropriate use criteria (AUC) for the use of CSF testing for AD pathology detection in the diagnostic process.25 Explore CSF AUC
CSF icon

Biomarker PET scans4,5,8

  • Used to determine presence of abnormal amyloid plaque and aggregated tau NFTs
  • Provides the means to assess visual evidence of brain amyloid and tau pathology in vivo
  • Approved amyloid PET scans are available for use at your discretion. Learn more about a biomarker PET scan
  • The Alzheimer’s Association and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging developed AUC for amyloid PET scans.26
  • Explore amyloid PET AUC
PET scan icon

Earlier consideration of therapeutic options27,28

  • Opportunity to consider available therapies approved for AD
  • Access to clinical trials with potential to benefit from current and future therapies that address the underlying pathology of the disease and contribute to local research opportunities
IV bag icon

Other routine diagnostic tools used in the assessment of patients include:

  • Labs: CBC, electrolytes, BUN, Cr, Ca, LFTs, glucose, TSH, B12, folate; consider RPR or MHA-TP (per patient history), HIV, heavy metals27,29,30
  • Structure neuroimaging (MRI)27,29,30
  • Neuropsychological assessment3,31
  • FDG-PET scan3,31

%P-tau217=ratio of P-tau217 to non–P-tau217 (expressed as percentage of P-tau217); Aβ=amyloid beta; BUN=blood urea nitrogen; Ca=calcium; CBC=complete blood count; CEOi=CEO Initiative; Cr=creatinine; CSF=cerebrospinal fluid; CT=computed tomography; FDG-PET=fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography; HIV=human immunodeficiency virus; LFTs=liver function tests; MCI=mild cognitive impairment; MHA-TP=microhemagglutination assay for Treponema pallidum antibodies; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; NFTs=neurofibrillary tangles; PET=positron emission tomography; RPR=rapid plasma regain; TSH=thyroid stimulating hormone.

*Commercially available BBM tests used to detect amyloid positivity are not standalone tests to determine a diagnosis. The results must be interpreted in conjunction with clinical assessment results. Patients must meet testing criteria.2

This study compared the performance of leading plasma biomarkers in detecting AD pathology and guiding treatment and clinical trial inclusion. A total of 1,179 plasma samples from 393 Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants were analyzed using assays from C2N Diagnostics, Fujirebio, ALZpath Quanterix, Janssen LucentAD Quanterix, and Roche NeuroToolKit. Plasma biomarkers P-tau217, P-tau181, and Aβ42/Aβ40 were assessed for their ability to classify amyloid PET status, tau PET status, cortical thickness, and cognitive impairment, with clinical assessments including the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR).13

P-tau217 used as a ratio, calculated as P-tau217 divided by non-phosphorylated tau217.13

§%P-tau217 demonstrated an AUC of up to 0.93, outperforming other P-tau217 assays, which ranged from 0.88 to 0.90.13

||In a study of 1213 patients with cognitive symptoms, blood tests were evaluated for AD pathology. The study used predefined cutoff values to assess the ability of %P-tau217 levels (the ratio of P-tau217/non-phosphorylated-tau217) alone and combined with the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio as a composite amyloid probability score (APS2) to identify AD pathology. Blood samples from both primary and secondary care groups were analyzed as a single batch or biweekly, comparing diagnostic accuracy between the blood tests and primary care physicians or dementia specialists. Secondary objectives included examining biomarker performance at various cognitive stages and testing different cutoff values.14

This list includes most LDTs for use in the United States and may not be available in all states due to state licensure requirements. LDTs are diagnostic tests that are designed, manufactured, and used in a single laboratory. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can approve or clear IVD tests, but the LDTs included here have not been evaluated, approved, or cleared by the FDA. Only certain labs are certified under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) as qualified to perform high-complexity clinical testing.

**The Global CEOi BBM Workgroup is a partnership consisting of individuals in academia who help validate blood-based biomarker tests and diagnostics, the medical device companies that develop them, pharmaceutical companies developing treatment pathways where BBMs may be useful, and patient advocacy groups that aim to improve AD care and treatment.

References:

  1. McDade E, Bednar M, Brashear HR, et al. The pathway to secondary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2020;6(1):e12069. doi:10.1002/trc2.12069
  2. Aisen PS, Cummings J, Jack CR Jr, et al. On the path to 2025: understanding the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9(1):60. doi:10.1186/s13195-017-0283-5
  3. Hort J, O’Brien JT, Gainotti G, et al. EFNS guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(10):1236-1248. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03040.x
  4. Grundman M, Pontecorvo MJ, Salloway SP, et al. Potential impact of amyloid imaging on diagnosis and intended management in patients with progressive cognitive decline. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2013;27(1):4-15. doi:10.1097/WAD.0b013e318279d02a
  5. Counts SE, Ikonomovic MD, Mercado N, et al. Biomarkers for the early detection and progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2017;14(1):35-53. doi:10.1007/s13311-016-0481-z
  6. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263-269. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
  7. Hampel H, O’Bryant SE, Molinuevo JL, et al. Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: mapping the road to the clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(11):639-652. doi:10.1038/s41582-018-0079-7
  8. Iaccarino L, Burnham SC, Dell’Agnello G, et al. Diagnostic biomarkers of amyloid and tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease: an overview of tests for clinical practice in the United States and Europe. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(3):426-442. doi:10.14283/jpad.2023.43
  9. Ashton NJ, Brum WS, Di Molfetta G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a plasma phosphorylated tau 217 immunoassay for Alzheimer disease pathology. JAMA Neurol. 2024;81(3):255-263. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.5319
  10. Schindler SE, Galasko D, Pereira AC, et al. Acceptable performance of blood biomarker tests of amyloid pathology — recommendations from the Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer’s Disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024;20(7):426-439. doi:10.1038/s41582-024-00977-5
  11. Mielke MM, Anderson M, Ashford JW, et al. Recommendations for clinical implementation of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. Published online October 1, 2024. doi:10.1002/alz.14184
  12. Hansson O, Edelmayer RM, Boxer AL, et al. The Alzheimer’s Association appropriate use recommendations for blood biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;18(12):2669-2686. doi:10.1002/alz.12756
  13. Schindler SE, Petersen KK, Saef B, et al; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Biomarkers Consortium Plasma Aβ and Phosphorylated Tau as Predictors of Amyloid and Tau Positivity in Alzheimer’s Disease Project Team. Head-to-head comparison of leading blood tests for Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(11):8074-8096. doi:10.1002/alz.14315
  14. Palmqvist S, Tideman P, Mattsson-Carlgren N, et al. Blood biomarkers to detect Alzheimer disease in primary care and secondary care. JAMA. 2024;332(15):1245-1257. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.13855
  15. ARUP® Laboratories. Lab test directory page. Phospho-tau 217, plasma. Accessed April 29, 2025. https://ltd.aruplab.com/Tests/Pub/3019017
  16. C2N Diagnostics. PrecivityAD2. Accessed December 17, 2024. https://precivityad.com/precivityad2-hcp
  17. Lucent Diagnostics. LucentAD® Complete. Accessed May 22, 2025. https://www.lucentdiagnostics.com/tests/lucentad-complete/
  18. Mayo Lab. Phosphorylated tau 217 (pTau-217) test overview. Accessed October 29, 2024. https://www.mayocliniclabs.com/test-catalog/Overview/621635
  19. Neurocode. ALZpath Dx: Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 (p-Tau 217). Neurocode Test Directory. Accessed April 29, 2025. https://neurocode.com/test/alzpath-plasma-phosphorylated-tau-217/
  20. Quest Diagnostics. AD-Detect Aβ42/40 and p-tau217 Evaluation, Plasma. Quest Diagnostics Test Directory. Accessed April 29, 2025. https://testdirectory.questdiagnostics.com/test/test-detail/14258/addetectabeta-4240-and-ptau217-evaluationplasma?q=14258&cc=MASTER
  21. Shaw LM, Arias J, Blennow K, et al. Appropriate use criteria for lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid testing in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(11):1505-1521. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.220
  22. Johnson KA, Minoshima S, Bohnen NI, et al; Alzheimer’s Association. Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: a report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):e1-e16. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.002
  23. Porsteinsson AP, Isaacson RS, Knox S, et al. Diagnosis of early Alzheimer’s disease: clinical practice in 2021. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8:371-386. doi:10.14283/jpad.2021.23
  24. Galvin JE, Aisen P, Langbaum JB, et al. Early stages of Alzheimer’s disease: evolving the care team for optimal patient management. Front Neurol. 2021;11:592302. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.592302
  25. Scharre DW, Trzepacz PT. Evaluation of cognitive impairment in older adults. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2013;11(4):482-500. doi:10.1176/appi.focus.11.4.482
  26. Act on Alzheimer’s. Clinical provider practice tool. Revised June 22, 2016. Accessed April 13, 2022. http://www.actonalz.org/sites/default/files/documents/ACT-Provider-ClinicalPracticeTool.pdf
  27. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270-279. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
  28. Palmqvist S, Warmenhoven N, Anastasi F, et al. Plasma phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis in primary and secondary care using a fully automated platform. Nat Med. 2025;31(6):2036-2043. doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03622-w
  29. Palmqvist S, Whitson HE, Allen LA, et al. Alzheimer’s Association Clinical Practice Guideline on the use of blood-based biomarkers in the diagnostic workup of suspected Alzheimer’s disease within specialized care settings. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21(7):1-127. doi:10.1002/alz.70535